|
SHASTA COUNTY RTPA POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL |
Number |
|
|
5-3 |
||
|
SECTION: Rules of
the RTPA |
Regional
Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Funding
Allocations by Jurisdiction |
|
|
APPROVAL
DATE: |
||
|
Page No. 1 of 2 |
||
|
|
|
|
POLICY FOR THE
DISBURSEMENT OF REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORATION PROGRAM (RSTP) FEDERAL EXCHANGE
AND STATE MATCH REQUEST TO JURISDICTIONS
BACKGROUND
In March of 1993 (Resolution 5-93)
the SCRTPA agreed to accept Exchange program funds as allocated under Section
182.6 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Funds may be exchanged for nonfederal State Highway Accounts funds.
Resolution 5-93 states that funds
are to be divided among the jurisdictions in the same manner as they are
allocated to the RTPA. These funds
shall be shared among the jurisdictions based on the ratio of the
jurisdiction’s latest urban area population estimate to that of the total
County’s urban area. Funds derived
under Section 182.6 (d) (2) shall be allocated to the County as specified by
law, and the balance of the funds shall be allocated between the cities and the
County on the basis of the ratio of each jurisdiction’s population growth from
1980-1990 to the County population growth during that period. The staffs of the
two cities and the County have agreed on the allocation formula.
Each of the entities has the
capability of selecting and prioritizing projects using those funds allocated
to them. The RTPA delegates to each of
the eligible entities project selection authority for projects to be funded
under this program.
The annual exchange funds are
allocated to the RTPA on an annual basis from the Department of Transportation
(DOT). The amount of funding allowable
is calculated by the DOT.
Two factors are used to determine
the amount allocated by jurisdiction.
Amounts are first allocated based upon the population in the urban area
based on 110% of the Federal Aid Urban (FAU) that preceded ISTEA . The remainder of funding, “other”, is
allocated based upon the growth in each entity from 1980 to 1990. The urban population is updated annually
using the Department of Finance’s E-1 report.
These population figures determine the percentage of funding allocated
to each jurisdiction based on the old FAU funding figures.
The amount of funds received from
exchange that exceed the Old FAU are presented as “other” and are allocated
based upon prior population figures for each jurisdiction as presented on the
attached allocation schedule.
The City of Shasta Lake was
incorporated on July 2, 1992. Prior to
incorporation, Shasta Lake’s population was included in the unincorporated area
of Shasta County. In order to obtain
census data, the United States Census Bureau must incorporate a city for one
year before it is recognized as a city.
The first documented census data for the City of Shasta Lake occurred in
1994/1995. The City of Shasta Lake became
eligible for exchange funds at this time, and was removed from the County’s
population.
An allocation summary is disbursed
to the jurisdictions that combine the Old FAU population allocations, and
“other” funding allocations.
FINANCIAL
CONTROLS
City and county agencies must
establish a separate account within their “Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund” or “County Road Fund” to deposit and account for State exchange and match
payments received directly from the RTPA.
City and county expenditures of
exchange and match funds will be subject to financial and compliance audits by
State of California auditors.
Agencies are required to submit an
annual document stating that RSTP exchange funds have been used for eligible
projects as defined in Section 133(b).
Agencies must submit documentation no later than July 31 of each year in
order to receive distribution of current year exchange funds.
In the event of an adverse audit
finding, the agency must return the State cash to the RTPA for allocation to
other eligible projects. If an adverse
finding is not corrected, a hold will be placed on future exchange and match
payments to the jurisdiction until such time as the adverse findings are
corrected to the satisfaction of the RTPA.