REPORT
TO SHASTA COUNTY RTPA
|
SUBJECT |
|
MEETING DATE |
ITEM NUMBER |
|
Award Audit Engagement for Fiscal and Compliance,
and Performance Audits |
07/22/03 |
3-7 |
|
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Agency award a three-year
audit engagement to D.H. Scott and Company for fiscal and compliance, and
performance audits for the three fiscal years ending June 30, 2003, 2004, 2005.
SUMMARY
D.H. Scott & Company submitted the low bid for
the financial and compliance, and performance audits. D.H. Scott and Company has nine years prior experience with RTPA
audits.
DISCUSSION
The Transportation Development Act regulations
require annual financial and compliance audits of all claimants and funds
maintained by the RTPA and triennial performance audits of the RTPA and RABA.
Staff contacted certified public accounting firms in
the Redding area and distributed Requests for Proposals to 11 firms who perform
audit services. Three proposals were
submitted as follows:
|
|
D.H. Scott |
Hathaway & Ksenzulak |
Nystrom & Co. |
|
3-year performance audit |
$ 3,500 |
$ 5,700 |
$
6,000 |
|
Financial Audit 2003 |
7,500 |
14,900 |
16,500 |
|
Financial Audit 2004 |
7,500 |
14,600 |
17,000 |
|
Financial Audit 2005 |
7,500 |
14,800 |
17,500 |
|
Total Proposal |
$ 26,000 |
$ 50,000 |
$ 57,000 |
The bid from D.H. Scott and Company is consistent
with prices charged in previous years and appears to be adequate to perform the
services requested.
ALTERNATIVES
The Board could choose to award the contract to
another bidder. This alternative would
increase the cost of the audits.
Nystrom and Company has performed these audits for the last three
years. The agency has had no audit
experience with Hathaway & Ksenzulak.
Another alternative would be to redistribute the
request for proposal. Although every
CPA firm in the telephone directory for Redding was solicited, the request
could be sent out to more firms in Sacramento, Chico and Auburn areas. Since the Transportation Development Act
regulations require the audit to be completed within 180 days after the end of
the fiscal year, this alternative could prevent the audit from being prepared
in a timely fashion.
OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
The Technical Advisory Committee supported this
recommendation.
FINANCING
These audits are paid from TDA funds and are
included in this year=s Overall Work Program.
Daniel J. Kovacich, Executive Officer
SLC/jac