REPORT
TO SHASTA COUNTY RTPA
|
SUBJECT |
|
MEETING DATE |
ITEM NUMBER |
|
Receive Presentation on
Transportation Needs and Funding Sources |
07/22/03 |
4 |
|
After receiving a presentation on transportation
funding needs and revenues it is recommended that the Agency:
As part of preparing the
2001 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) approximately $680 million of capacity
increasing improvements were identified region wide. Also, due to State and Federal budget deficits, it appears very
unlikely that the local agencies and Caltrans will be able to keep up with the
demand for increased transportation facilities - due to lack of funding. As a result of these two issues, staff has
performed a more comprehensive needs assessment region wide, with the purpose
of beginning a dialogue or discussion about enhancing revenues for
transportation. A discussion paper
regarding this study is attached.
This review differs from
earlier review in that it includes transit as well as streets and highways,
maintenance costs, and revenue streams.
Very high-level results of the study indicate that through the year 2025
there will be approximately $4 billion in transportation needs. In that same time period we have only been
able to identify approximately $1.7B in revenues, leaving a shortfall of
approximately $2.3 billion.
A presentation has been
prepared to demonstrate to the Agency the impacts of projected traffic volumes
on our facilities versus the current conditions. Currently the transportation systems throughout the region
function very well, with very short periods of congestion. However, as we continue to utilize excess
capacity on our roadways, motorists in Shasta County will begin to experience
longer and longer periods of congestion.
Additionally, the condition of the pavement throughout the region will
continue to require periodic maintenance.
It is apparent that motorists in the future will spend more time in
congestion on poorer quality roads.
Staff does not believe the
time is right now to present a sales tax measure to the voters. This presentation and any Agency action or
direction should be considered as a start at looking at the problem. There are no easy solutions to this problem;
however, it will certainly not be solved if we do not take the first step.
The Agency could choose to
not accept the staff recommendation.
The Agency could choose to modify the staff recommendation as they see
fit. At this time this is not
recommended because it is apparent that there is a need for additional funding
for transportation, and the Agency should lay the foundation or groundwork for
future revenue enhancements.
This item has no direct
impact on the finances of the RTPA; however, any action decided upon could have
a significant and profound effect on the transportation system of the future.
Daniel J. Kovacich,
Executive Officer
DJK/jac
Attachments: Discussion Paper