REPORT TO SHASTA COUNTY RTPA

 

 

 

SUBJECT

 

 

 

MEETING

DATE

 

ITEM

NUMBER

 

 

Public Involvement Procedure Update - Consider Action

 

 

12/10/02

 

4

 

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the Board authorize initiation of the 45-day public and agency review of the Draft Public Involvement Update.

 

SUMMARY

Federal regulations require that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) develop public involvement procedures.  The Board last adopted the Public Involvement Procedures for Transportation Planning in December 1998 and considered a revision in July 2002. Based upon feedback from the Agency at that meeting, the procedures considered in July were revised.  The purpose of this document is to promote public participation and interagency consultation in the comprehensive transportation planning process.

 

DISCUSSION

The Public Involvement Procedures contain objectives, strategies, and measures of effectiveness.

 

The plan contains the following objectives:

 

1.               Raise understanding of the transportation planning process in the region and identify how interested citizens can become involved.

2.               Provide opportunities for public involvement in the transportation planning process.

3.               Maintain contact with interested citizens and key stakeholders throughout the process of developing MPO plans and programs.

4.               Identify and involve traditionally under-served persons (those who are of minority, low–income or elderly status).

5.               Inform and educate incoming MPO Board members and local commissioners/council members regarding MPO functions, responsibilities and programs.

 

The plan will be evaluated annually to enhance public participation and program effectiveness.  The written objectives provide a more systematic means to document the evaluation process.

 

This Agency action will authorize an advertisement of a 45-day public and Agency comment period.  It is anticipated that this plan will be returned to the Agency for final approval at the February meeting.

 

ALTERNATIVES

The Board could choose not to update the current practice.  Staff does not recommend this because it is a Federal recommendation to update this practice every three years.

 

OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT

Caltrans District 2, Shasta County, the cities of Redding, Shasta Lake and

Anderson and the Redding Area Bus Authority have all been consulted via memos and TAC meetings.

 

FINANCING

The funding for development of this plan and the monitoring of goals and objectives are budgeted in the Overall Work Program (OWP), under Element 709 Overall Work Program Development/Interagency Coordination.

 

 

 

________________________________________

Daniel J. Kovacich, Executive Officer

 

TLH/jac

 

Attachment: Public Involvement Procedures For Transportation Planning